Animal cruelty in Auatralia is a most serious offence

It is the contention of the petitioners that Mr. Raymond Hoser, has in fact violated the following laws. And by his publications and pictures provide the target departments of this petition probable cause to seek legal action against Mr. Raymond Hoser.

That Mr. Raymond Hoser by his own admission has conducted surgical procedures in violation of Australian Law as cited below.

Mr.Raymond Hoser has by his own admission as well as photographic and written evidence proclaimed to be the surgeon of record and owner of the animals pre-surgery, surgery and post surgery to the animals involved in this petition and as such we believe is in violation of

Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1986
Act No. 46/1986
Version incorporating amendments as at 1 December 2005

Sections/Subsections

"Code of Practice" means a Code of Practice made and published and as varied from time to time under section 7; person in charge of in relation to an animal or thing, includes—

(a) a person who has the animal or thing in the person's possession or custody, or under the person's care, control or supervision

"prescribed" means prescribed by the regulations;

"regulations" means regulations made under this Act;

"scientific premises" means a premises ordinarily used for scientific research, teaching or testing;

(a) an animal is subjected to—
(i) surgical, medical, psychological, biological, chemical or physical treatment; or
(ii) conditions of heat, cold, light, dark, confinement, noise, isolation or overcrowding to which an animal of that species is not accustomed
(B) any tissue, material or substance is extracted or derived from the body of an animal
(f) any other purpose prescribed for the purposes of this paragraph— but does not include—
(g) the treatment of an animal for the purpose of promoting its health or welfare by or in accordance with the instructions of a veterinary practitioner; or
(h) the conduct of animal husbandry carried out in accordance with a Code of Practice

Part 1—Preliminary

"scientific procedures premises licence" means a licence issued under section 29;

"veterinary practitioner" means a veterinary practitioner registered under the Veterinary Practice Act 1997;

Version No. 070
Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1986
Act No. 46/1986
Version incorporating amendments as at 1 December 2005
www.dpi.vic.gov.au/...../POCTAV70.pdf


Veterinary Practice Act 1997
Act No. 58/1997

Quoting, Mr. Raymond Hoser. These are his exact words from the noted publication in which he states, that he Mr.Hoser did in fact himself conduct this procedure. That Mr. Raymond Hoser is in fact owner of the reptiles.

Surgically enhanced venomous snakes. Venom glands out, silicone implants in! The creation of perfect exhibition snakes in the post HIH era.
Raymond Hoser
488 Park Road, Park Orchards,Victoria, 3114, Australia.
Email: adder@smuggled.com

[QUOTE]Bearing this in mind, in preparing for the surgery in my case/s, a far more effective means was devised to restrain snakes without incident. This is explained later and shown in the photographs taken at the time and in the absence of other yet unknown better procedures, I strongly recommend that persons doing venomoid surgery use the techniques developed and refined by myself as given in this paper.[End quote]

[Quote]The method I devised allowed me to immobilize any species of snake without causing them harm, keep them immobilized as long as necessary and then to allow them to revive almost immediately after surgery.[End Quote]

[Quote]Because I had complete control over the snake's state of consciousness, I was also able to accurately measure the snake and photograph it in it's operational state before terminating the procedure.[End quote]

[Quote]Also as soon as the towel was removed I commenced removing the tape holding down the snake.[End quote]

[Quote]It was suggested that a soldering iron be used to cauterize wounds and stop bleeding, but due to the effectiveness of the syringe method, I never bothered testing the alternative.[End Quote]

[Quote]In the first operation I used a head magnifying glass to be able to better see the area operated on.[End quote]

[Quote]Different sized sutures were trialled and I had a preference for the original (large) size as opposed to the smaller ones, which I found harder to use and hence extended the time taken to perform the surgery.[End quote]

[Quote]As with all other aspects of the procedure, suture types should be trialled well before the first operation if there is doubt as to whether or not you will be able to work with one or other type of suture or needle. In line with most surgeons, I preferred curved needles to straight ones.[End quote]

[Quote]A second reason why I stayed with non-dissolving sutures was that it was deemed sensible to restrain the snakes and inspect them about 10-14 days after surgery to check that they were healing correctly at which time the sutures could be removed within a minute or so anyway.[End Quote]

The above quotes are by Mr. Raymond Hoser himself and as such warrants investigation to the laws noted above.

Sincerely,
The Petitioners
www.aussiereptileclassifieds.com/phpPETITION



* Please feel free to distribute this banner and promote this website *



Back to the petition